Skip to main content
The AI Spend Agent dashboard is organized into sections you navigate from the left rail. Each section answers a different question: how much are you spending, where is it going, what’s wrong, what to do about it, and what’s been recovered.
Every section reflects the last 30 days of data pulled from your connected providers. To pull fresh data on demand, use Sync now and Refresh insights.
If the agent’s top-bar status is amber and reads · action needed, one of your provider connections has a revoked or unusable admin key. Syncing is paused for that connection and the numbers on this page are frozen at its last successful sync until you rotate the key. See Connection sync health.

Overview

Overview is the headline view: how much your team is spending on AI and how that’s trending.
  • 30-day spend — Total cost across Anthropic and OpenAI over the last 30 days.
  • Tokens (30d) — Total tokens consumed, split between input and output.
  • Cache-read rate — Share of input tokens served from a prompt cache, plus the raw read vs. written token counts. High cache-read rates mean you’re paying less for repeated context.
  • Models tracked — How many distinct models the agent has seen usage from.
  • Price / 1M tokens — Blended cost across input and output tokens in the window, expressed per million tokens. Useful as a headline unit price you can compare across periods or after switching models.
  • Cost / request — Average cost per provider-reported request. The average is taken only over rows the provider reports a request count for, so the cost basis is the request-reporting spend rather than total spend. Anthropic’s usage API is token-only, so if all your usage is Anthropic this shows with provider does not report request counts.
  • Daily spend chart — Per-day spend bars with a 7-day moving average line to smooth out day-to-day noise.
Above the KPIs, a provider tab strip (“All providers” plus one tab per connected provider that has usage) scopes every metric on the page to that provider. Only providers with usage get a tab — a connected provider that hasn’t produced any spend yet won’t appear. Overview is the fastest way to spot a spend spike or a sudden drop in cache efficiency.

Usage

Usage decomposes the same 30 days by dimension. Each section shows a spend-mix donut alongside a ranked table.
  • Spend by model — Every model that produced cost in the window, with input, output, cache-write and cache-read tokens per model plus each model’s share of total spend.
  • Spend by provider — The same breakdown grouped by Anthropic vs. OpenAI.
  • Spend by API key — Which keys are driving cost, useful for isolating a runaway integration.
  • Spend by team member — Cost attributed to each team member, ranked. Click a row to open that member’s drill-down page — see Team member drill-down.
Use Usage when Overview surfaces a change and you need to attribute it: which model got more expensive, which provider is driving the shift, and whether cache usage moved along with it.

Cascading filters

The filter bar above the breakdowns is cascading: each dropdown only shows values that are still possible given the ones above it. Pick a provider and the Model dropdown narrows to that provider’s models; pick a model and API Key narrows to keys that used it; and so on down through Team Member. If an upstream change makes a downstream selection impossible (for example, switching to Anthropic while an OpenAI model is picked), the downstream dropdown resets to All on its own.

Team member drill-down

From the Spend by team member breakdown, click a row to open a per-member view for the last 90 days. It shows:
  • Spend, Tokens, Cache-read rate, Requests — The member’s headline numbers, with team-median comparisons on cache-read rate and team-p90 comparisons on tokens per request so you can see whether they’re an outlier or in line with the rest of the team.
  • Model mix — A donut of which models the member’s spend went to.
  • Recommendations — Per-member optimization suggestions with an estimated annual saving where the agent can quantify one.
  • Findings for this member — Every open finding attributed to that member’s email, so you can see anomalies and violations tied to their usage in one place.
The member view is a drill-down of the same data, not a separate audit — findings match what appears elsewhere in the dashboard.

Anomalies

Anomalies collect behavioral and efficiency findings the agent produced from your usage. Each row is one finding, tied to a specific rule (e.g. spend_spike_anomaly, cache_efficiency_outlier, model_overkill, stale_key_active). Categories covered here:
  • Usage patterns — Spend spikes, off-hours usage.
  • Governance — Stale keys, untagged keys, workspace concentration, subscription-cheaper opportunities.
  • Cache efficiency — Cache-write overspend, cache-read opportunities, cache-efficiency outliers.
  • Model efficiency — Over-powered model choices, low-output request bursts, tokens-per-request outliers.
You can filter findings by severity (high / medium / low), date range, and category. Click any row to expand it — you’ll see the human-readable explanation, the attribution (model, key, workspace, or user where available), the pricing basis the agent used, and a Confidence score (0–100%) for rules that produce one. Confidence is separate from severity: a low-confidence high-severity finding is worth double-checking before acting; a high-confidence low-severity finding is usually safe to treat as real.

Violations

Violations are the disputable findings: billing and pricing discrepancies where the provider’s charge doesn’t match what pricing says it should have been. These findings can back a refund claim in Recovery. Categories covered here:
  • Billing — Billing discrepancies (point-in-time and windowed), rate & discount summaries.
  • Pricing data — Stale pricing entries, unknown-model observations.
Violations use the same filters and expand-for-detail interaction as Anomalies. Each finding is categorized into either Anomalies or Violations — a single finding never appears in both.

Action Plan

The Action Plan is your prioritized to-do list. It takes every finding — anomalies and violations — and ranks them by estimated dollar impact, biggest first. At the top of the page you’ll see the total identified opportunity: the sum of estimated impact across every open finding. Each item shows the finding title, its severity, the human explanation, and its individual impact. Work top-down to pick up the highest-value fixes first.
Refund claims aren’t tracked on Action Plan. Anything that can be recovered as a refund lives in Recovery — Action Plan focuses on the optimization work you own.

Recovery

Recovery is the home for refund claims filed against billing violations. See Recovery and refund claims for the full walkthrough.